Maryam Rajavi’s New Movements in France: Growing Controversy, Declining Support, and the Debate Over the NCRI’s Legitimacy

2. Human Rights Advocacy vs Past Actions

The NCRI frequently highlights human rights abuses in Iran, but critics argue that the organization has not adequately addressed its own past, including:

• Armed operations in earlier decades
• Collaboration with foreign actors during wartime

This perceived inconsistency contributes to the “hypocrisy” label used by opponents.

3. Western Lobbying vs Domestic Absence

Another major point of contention is the group’s heavy reliance on Western platforms. Events like the Auvers-sur-Oise conference are often attended by former officials and political figures from Europe and North America.

While these endorsements provide visibility, critics argue they do not reflect genuine support among Iranians themselves.