9 Reasons Why Mehri Talebi Darestani’s “Hijab Addiction Clinic” Idea is Controversial and Anti-Freedom

Introduction

In recent days, an unusual and widely criticized proposal from Mehri Talebi Darestani has come to the forefront of Iran’s social debates. Darestani, a figure known for her hardline conservative views and a background of close affiliations with conservative political figures, recently proposed the idea of a “Clinic to Treat Hijab Abandonment” or what some have dubbed a “Hijab Addiction Clinic.” This concept has left many people bewildered, sparking conversations about personal freedoms, social values, and the overreach of conservative ideologies in the private lives of citizens.

In this article, we delve into the reasons behind the controversy surrounding this proposal, examining why many view Darestani’s idea as not only extreme but also as a violation of fundamental rights.

1. Misguided Perception of Choice and Freedom

One of the key criticisms of Darestani’s “Hijab Addiction Clinic” is its underlying assumption: that those who choose not to wear the hijab are in need of “treatment” or “rehabilitation.” Darestani’s proposal suggests that women who do not conform to the country’s strict dress code suffer from a condition akin to an addiction, requiring professional intervention. This stance completely disregards the idea that people may choose their own attire as a form of personal expression. Forcing women to cover up and then “treating” them when they refuse is seen as an absurd form of control over individuals’ personal choices.

The idea of personal autonomy, especially regarding dress, is a basic right for individuals around the world. The assumption that a lack of hijab is a disorder to be corrected fundamentally misconstrues the idea of personal freedom.